Showing posts with label celebrity. Show all posts
Showing posts with label celebrity. Show all posts

Wednesday, December 8, 2010

Attention Whores

The idea for this post started a couple of months ago, when Lady Gaga wore a meat dress to the VMAs and spoke out about Don't Ask Don't Tell. Many internet commenters were insistent that Lady Gaga is not committed to gay rights, and that the entire effort was just to get attention. The phrase "attention whore" came up a few times. This bothered me. Since then, I've paid more attention to the way that celebrity women are talked about online.

Some examples (trigger warning for misogyny and wishes of death):

Ke$ha
I’m tired of seeing this dirty slag… can someone please inform her that her 15 minutes of fame are up?
Snooki

Snooki–because the world needs another no-talent fame-hag. 
Please dear God just make it go away..please…..
On a gif of Snooki floating through space:
Shame we can’t make this happen in reality – fortunately for me I’m not in the US, but I’ve seen enough pictures of this … *ahem* woman(?) … to know she’s a waste of oxygen!

Tila Tequila
Bitch should be kept in a damn cage.
this whore isn't dead yet?

Lady Gaga

She is disgusting, a completely irrelevant object. How can anyone look up to this woman.
god someone please set her on fire
When will this attention whore fall of the radar?

Lady Gaga and Yoko Ono

"I've been a talentless fame whore for decades. Let me take your hand and show you the way."

Most of these comments are from that pit of slut-shaming and homophobia, ROFLrazzi. The last one is from Jezebel.

There is so much wrong with the phrase "attention whore" itself, not to mention the way it is used to reinforce the dismissive and eliminationist language aimed at women who dare to live publicly, that it's taken me this long to figure out how to approach the subject. First, I'll address why we shouldn't be using "whore" as an insult. Then, why we shouldn't be using "attention seeker" as an insult. Finally, I'll talk about the implications of the entire phrase, and the way we talk about celebrities.

Wednesday, July 7, 2010

Feminist Celebrity Watching?

About a month ago, I posted on the community side of Feministing about my annoyance with Jezebel hating on celebrity women. That was about a couple of instances when Jez writers and commenters all but asserted that certain famous women do not have the same rights to autonomy and personal boundaries as everyone else. To which I say, such rights are fundamental, and no amount of moving conspicuously through public space can forfeit those rights. Basically, Jezebel sucks at applying a feminist perspective to celebrity watching.

Which brings me to the latest example of Jezebel sucking. When I checked the site today, the item at the top of the page was, "Watch Lindsay Lohan Break Down During Her Sentencing."

Um, no. And also, why? I feel like the "Leave Britney Alone" guy here, but he actually had a good point. Celebrities are human beings. In many ways they are very lucky and highly privileged human beings. But it's the "human" part I want to focus on.

To me, one of the core principles of being a feminist is that everybody is equal in terms of a basic level of dignity. That means that every woman, from sex workers to presidential candidates to bloggers to starlets is assumed to be a thinking, feeling person with an inner life and aspirations, a unique perspective informed by life experiences, and reasons for behaving the way that she does. In light of this, there is a minimal level of respect with which everyone should be treated.



The morbid fascination with celebrity downfalls, to the point that one would watch a video of an individual's emotional breakdown, seems to me to be fundamentally at odds with that principle.

I get celebrity watching, and keeping up with celebrity gossip, I do. But an individual's life is not a spectator sport. There's a line. And that video crossed it.