The existence of white female privilege is being debated. (See the comments here, or just read Renee's take on the whole thing). I see the debate as an example of the continued failure of white feminists to grasp intersectionality.
As I wrote here,
The universal human being is not just male. He is heterosexual, cisgender, able-bodied, middle-class, and - in Europe, North America, Australia and New Zealand - white. We tend to conceptualize every deviation from the default atomistically, even though this does not reflect individual identities or experiences. So, for example, the experiences of a disabled woman of colour do not amount to the experiences of a white able-bodied woman + an able-bodied man of colour + a white disabled man. Her experiences are those of a disabledwomanofcolour. The different aspects of her identity cannot be separated out from each other.
As such, I do not just experience marginalization as a woman. I experience marginalization as a white woman (among many other aspects of my identity).
By the same token, I do not just have privilege as a white person. I have privilege as a white woman. I have white female privilege.
That is, there are assumptions made and expectations placed on me that, vis-a-vis my interactions with white men, rather suck. But vis-a-vis my interactions with people of colour - particularly women of colour - those same assumptions and expectations privilege me.
This is not contradictory. It's about relative power in the kyriarchy. This is intersectionality.
By the same token, I do not just have privilege as a white person. I have privilege as a white woman. I have white female privilege.
That is, there are assumptions made and expectations placed on me that, vis-a-vis my interactions with white men, rather suck. But vis-a-vis my interactions with people of colour - particularly women of colour - those same assumptions and expectations privilege me.
This is not contradictory. It's about relative power in the kyriarchy. This is intersectionality.